@EU #EU Letter to Commissioner @VeraJourova re Safeguarding the Best Interest of Children across Europe #teamJunckerEU

16 05 11 Vera JourovaThe Plenary Debate of the EU Parliament on Children’s Rights on 27 April 2016 was addressed at the EU Commission and the EU Council.

Commissioner Vera Jourova responded and promised a revised version of the Brussels II Regulation by June.

Here’s our input:

  1. the full 7-page letter;
  2. its conclusion:

After experiences with hundreds of cases and the positive responses by MEPs in general and the PETI and JURI Committees in particular, this is therefore to ask you to concentrate in your revision of Brussels II on:

  1. The setting up of specialised chambers in family courts, as suggested in the EU Press Release[1] about the Plenary Debate:
    1. To authorise Social Services to remove children only once parents have been convicted of a crime;
    2. In the spirit of the Resolution passed by Parliament, to distinguish between the parental responsibility of biological parents and the State grasping this undue responsibility for itself;
  1. The Parliamentary Assembly is concerned about the functioning of family courts in some member States of the Council of Europe, and especially about cases where children are taken away against the will of their parents and in violation of the right to respect for family life and the principle of a fair trial;
  2. Children ought to be separated from their parents only in very exceptional circumstances, subject to judicial review and in line with the requirements stemming from the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989;
  • The Assembly therefore calls on member States to fully implement the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
  1. the unwarranted complete severing of family ties;
  2. often in combination with removing children from parental care at birth,
  • basing placement decisions on the effluxion of time
  1. and/or recourse to adoptions without parental consent.
    1. Addressing the issue of jurisdiction of Member States over children of other Member States and beyond;
      1. In the spirit of safeguarding children’s ‘best interests’, priority therefore needs to be put on preventing Social Services from removing children before legal proceedings even reach the state of interim or permanent placement, let alone forced adoptions;
    2. Returning foreign children from Member States of the EU and the Council of Europe to their biological parents. This would include the reversal of placement and adoption orders:
      1. Concerning foreign children whose consulates and embassies were not informed;
      2. Due to listening to UK children ‘screaming to be heard’;
  • And responding to UK and foreign parents who have not committed any crimes and whose wills were overruled in secret Family Courts and the Court of Protection.

[1] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20160426IPR24708/Kids’-best-interests-must-come-first-in-cross-border-custody-cases-urge-MEPs

[2] http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=19220&lang=EN

[3] http://www.assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/News/News-View-EN.asp?newsid=5397&lang=2&cat=133

Advertisements

Author: Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s